Bradley Rudner

Topic

Proof-of-Concept Trial: Nature-based Intervention and Resistance Training for Improving Men’s Mental Health

School of Child and Youth Care

Date & location

• Monday, August 26, 2024
• 10:00 A.M.
• Clearihue Building, Room B021

Examining Committee

Supervisory Committee

• Dr. Nevin Harper, School of Child and Youth Care, University of Victoria (Supervisor)
• Dr. Ryan Rhodes, School of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, UVic (Outside Member)

External Examiner

• Dr. Megan Ames, Department of Psychology, UVic

Chair of Oral Examination

• Dr. Pablo Restrepo Gautier, Department of Hispanic and Italian Studies, UVic

Abstract

Background: Men disproportionately are struggling academically, with mental health, addiction, suicide, and all-cause mortality. These issues are especially prevalent in young males aged 18-34.

Purpose of Research: Through the theoretical lens of self-determination theory (SDT), this proof-of-concept trial examines the potential for the consecutive dual interventions of an in-person nature-based intervention (NBI) group connection and a virtually supported resistance training (RT) program to provide a benefit for male mental health and well-being.

Methods: A variety of recruitment strategies were utilized to enlist participants to fill two groups for the study. Intake documents provided a baseline understanding of participants’ current physical and mental well-being. Each group met separately for two consecutive days in a nature setting to connect, discuss, and partake in activities designed to enhance the aspects of autonomy, competency, and relatedness within the SDT framework. The NBI segment concluded with assessment documents and an RT plan in place. The following six weeks included a guided RT program with weekly video conference call check-ins. Upon completion of the RT segment final assessments and exit interviews were completed with participants.

Results: Participants reported satisfaction with both segments of the intervention, greater relatedness, competency, and autonomy for implementing and adhering to health habits in their own lives, including RT. In exit interviews, they highlighted the support formed through the group’s in-person NBI and the subsequent weekly check-ins during the RT program as a significant lever in their progress toward positive changes. The NBI offered an opportunity for relatedness to be established within a less distracting context. The RT program built competency and autonomy with the scaffolding of their interpersonal connection.

Conclusion: Findings suggest that, for this sample, the NBI-RT intervention has potential to benefit males’ health and well-being through improved motivation for implementation and adherence to healthy behaviors. The satisfaction with both the NBI and RT segments of the study, the positive shifts in motivation, and the improvements in anxiety and depression metrics suggest that moving to a feasibility trial is recommended.